The gazillion reasons as to why i curse when i drive :
1. The idiot didn't give signal when cutting into my lane.
2. The idiot was driving waaayyyyy tooo slow when the traffic light is green.
3. The idiot parked illegally, blocking my way, or making it difficult for me to drive out.
4. The idiot motorist who suddenly go right in front of you without giving signal.
5. The idiot motorist who is riding his motorcycle right in the middle of your lane and going sloooowwww.
6. The idiot who drive crazy fast then cut into your lane without giving signal. Just coz you drive an expensive car, it doesn't give you the license to drive like an asshole.
7. the idiot who HONKED at me despite the fact i gave signal that i want to do a U TURN which is a LEGAL U TURN.
8. A dead cat or dog by the road side.
9. Idiots who parked illegally when there are STILL EMPTY CAR PARKS AVAILABLE.
10. Idiots who blocked my car with their car and didn't leave their number.
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Simply a Rude B*stard
I have heard many advises from people saying that if you are unhappy with your partner about something, don't shout or scold your partner but instead tell him or her in a NICE WAY that whatever he or she is doing is not to your liking.
Don't fight fire with fire. Out of curiousity, i watched the Namawee's video where he was THRASHING UTUSAN. Let me summarized the whole issue for you : basically he's pissed off that some journalist who didn't want to watch his stupid movie a.k.a Nasi Lemak 2.0. Is that just the reason why he got so pissed off? I don't think so since you can tell from his reaction in the video.
Why was he so pissed off at the journalist?
1. The journalist reminded readers of his PAST MISTAKE(S). His INFAMOUS NEGARAKUKU music video, It's one thing to humiliate a particular race, but it's another thing when you insult a particular RELIGION. Even i can't forget his insults in the video.
2. The journalist attacked his sincerity and genuineness in promoting racial unity. Even i don't believe his sincerity. From Negarakuku to all this 1Malaysia promotional videos/songs? Isn't he trying too hard to please everyone after being such a racist bastard? He should just shut up and disappear into thin air instead of doing all these 1Malaysia thing.
3. The journalist questioned why no severe actions were taken against him after the Negarakuku fiasco. It's like as if saying sorry was sufficient enough. Maybe after what Namawee did, he should just lay low instead of going around making more videos bitching and insulting more things like TNB and Malaysia football quality.
I googled up for this journalist's article because i wanted to see how bad did she criticized Namawee's movie since from the way he reacted, it's like as if she humiliated him soooo bad.But her article wasn't even OFFENSIVE as compared to his video. In her article, the journalist clearly stated that she has nothing against his movie but it's him she has a problem with. I know what she feels and i feel the same way too.
Why would people want to boycott Nasi Lemak 2.0?
Simply because they don't like Namawee and couldn't forgive him for his so called past "mistake" and encourage people not to watch his movie because it will make him richer and famous.
Why I wouldn't watch his movie?1.
1. I hate him.
2. I despise him.
3. Why should i watch a movie being made by him and give him profits? It's like going to a restaurant owned by an ex which u hate and making him richer by dining at his place.
4. I seriously hate him.
5. And like what the journalist of the article said, even if you give me FREE TICKETS, i wouldn't want to watch it. That shows how much i hate him.
Of course, some Namawee defenders will say :
1. Please forgive and forget. Don't keep grudges.
2. He's a talented entertainer. Really? If you say talented at being vulgar and rude i will sooooooo agree on that. AND OBVIOUSLY the journalist wasn't giving a review on his movie (as what the idiot claims).
She didn't even criticize his movie. She merely gave her OWN OPINION on what she really thinks about NAMAWEE.
I'm being very critical about Namawee because :
1. he overreacted. it's like as if i commented "i hate you" and you replied "go die bitch".
2. Why bitched about Utusan too? Why not just attacked the journalist? Or is this his "golden opportunity" to attack Utusan for some personal hatred?
3. The way he talks is like as if he's some kind of a hot shot gangster wannabe. *puke*
4. Attacked the journalist credibility. hello, at least she sounds more civilised and well mannered than this rude jackass.
I'll let you be the JUDGE as to whether the journalist deserve such humiliation from this rude donkey ass :
The video :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtCu1Cm7caM
The article :
http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2011&dt=0921&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Rencana&pg=re_05.htm
Don't fight fire with fire. Out of curiousity, i watched the Namawee's video where he was THRASHING UTUSAN. Let me summarized the whole issue for you : basically he's pissed off that some journalist who didn't want to watch his stupid movie a.k.a Nasi Lemak 2.0. Is that just the reason why he got so pissed off? I don't think so since you can tell from his reaction in the video.
Why was he so pissed off at the journalist?
1. The journalist reminded readers of his PAST MISTAKE(S). His INFAMOUS NEGARAKUKU music video, It's one thing to humiliate a particular race, but it's another thing when you insult a particular RELIGION. Even i can't forget his insults in the video.
2. The journalist attacked his sincerity and genuineness in promoting racial unity. Even i don't believe his sincerity. From Negarakuku to all this 1Malaysia promotional videos/songs? Isn't he trying too hard to please everyone after being such a racist bastard? He should just shut up and disappear into thin air instead of doing all these 1Malaysia thing.
3. The journalist questioned why no severe actions were taken against him after the Negarakuku fiasco. It's like as if saying sorry was sufficient enough. Maybe after what Namawee did, he should just lay low instead of going around making more videos bitching and insulting more things like TNB and Malaysia football quality.
I googled up for this journalist's article because i wanted to see how bad did she criticized Namawee's movie since from the way he reacted, it's like as if she humiliated him soooo bad.But her article wasn't even OFFENSIVE as compared to his video. In her article, the journalist clearly stated that she has nothing against his movie but it's him she has a problem with. I know what she feels and i feel the same way too.
Why would people want to boycott Nasi Lemak 2.0?
Simply because they don't like Namawee and couldn't forgive him for his so called past "mistake" and encourage people not to watch his movie because it will make him richer and famous.
Why I wouldn't watch his movie?1.
1. I hate him.
2. I despise him.
3. Why should i watch a movie being made by him and give him profits? It's like going to a restaurant owned by an ex which u hate and making him richer by dining at his place.
4. I seriously hate him.
5. And like what the journalist of the article said, even if you give me FREE TICKETS, i wouldn't want to watch it. That shows how much i hate him.
Of course, some Namawee defenders will say :
1. Please forgive and forget. Don't keep grudges.
2. He's a talented entertainer. Really? If you say talented at being vulgar and rude i will sooooooo agree on that. AND OBVIOUSLY the journalist wasn't giving a review on his movie (as what the idiot claims).
She didn't even criticize his movie. She merely gave her OWN OPINION on what she really thinks about NAMAWEE.
I'm being very critical about Namawee because :
1. he overreacted. it's like as if i commented "i hate you" and you replied "go die bitch".
2. Why bitched about Utusan too? Why not just attacked the journalist? Or is this his "golden opportunity" to attack Utusan for some personal hatred?
3. The way he talks is like as if he's some kind of a hot shot gangster wannabe. *puke*
4. Attacked the journalist credibility. hello, at least she sounds more civilised and well mannered than this rude jackass.
I'll let you be the JUDGE as to whether the journalist deserve such humiliation from this rude donkey ass :
The video :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtCu1Cm7caM
The article :
http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2011&dt=0921&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Rencana&pg=re_05.htm
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
The Nagging Bitch
Women don't like to nag, however men cause women to nag by being selfish and inconsiderate. Who wouldn't make it a big fuss when you tell that person a few times not to do something but yet the person does it? It's f*cking irritating.
One of the MANY REASONS why i can't see myself married is that some men CAN'T PEE PROPERLY. Their penis is created like a hose, so why in the bloody hell can't they shoot into the toilet bowl without dripping ALL OVER THE BLOODY TOILET SEAT? One of the explanation from my fellow male friends is that it's UNAVOIDABLE because after peeing the urine will drip, hence the urine stains around the toilet seat.
That's utter BULLSH*T.
1. don't u wash after peeing?
2. don't u look where u shoot?
3. and if u see there's pee stain, aren't u civilised enough to clean it?
As a woman, if i have a husband who does this? I'll be nagging the whole time especially if he keeps on doing it after i told him off so many times. Why in the f*cking hell do i have to clean up after him? Do i look like a freaking maid? A toilet cleaner?
If i live under the same roof with him, do i always have to look around the toilet seat to make sure there is no urine stains?
Do i have to pull him by the ear, and bring him to the toilet and show him the mess he made?
Or i have to clean up after him just because i'm his freaking wife and it's SUPPOSEDLY A SMALL MATTER?
And i refuse to accept that peeing all over the toilet seat is a MAN'S NATURALLY THING TO DO.
One of the MANY REASONS why i can't see myself married is that some men CAN'T PEE PROPERLY. Their penis is created like a hose, so why in the bloody hell can't they shoot into the toilet bowl without dripping ALL OVER THE BLOODY TOILET SEAT? One of the explanation from my fellow male friends is that it's UNAVOIDABLE because after peeing the urine will drip, hence the urine stains around the toilet seat.
That's utter BULLSH*T.
1. don't u wash after peeing?
2. don't u look where u shoot?
3. and if u see there's pee stain, aren't u civilised enough to clean it?
As a woman, if i have a husband who does this? I'll be nagging the whole time especially if he keeps on doing it after i told him off so many times. Why in the f*cking hell do i have to clean up after him? Do i look like a freaking maid? A toilet cleaner?
If i live under the same roof with him, do i always have to look around the toilet seat to make sure there is no urine stains?
Do i have to pull him by the ear, and bring him to the toilet and show him the mess he made?
Or i have to clean up after him just because i'm his freaking wife and it's SUPPOSEDLY A SMALL MATTER?
And i refuse to accept that peeing all over the toilet seat is a MAN'S NATURALLY THING TO DO.
Saturday, August 20, 2011
The Racist Offensive Nivea Ad
Read this article first : http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/nivea-pulls-offensive-ad-185220424.html
My first impression when i read the article and look at the ad, it does look and sound racist. "Re-civilize" yourself. From the ad it would look like having afro hair and thick beard isn't idealistic.
But after a few mins of thinking, you can look at this whole pic from another point of view. Had the model been a WHITE MALE about to those A WHITE MAN'S HEAD with long messy hair and thick beard, would it look racist? Probably it will look ANTI HIPPIES.
Logically speaking, if a white man were to look messy, he would have long messy hair with thick/long beard. Now if a black man were to look messy, obviously he would have a messy afro hair with thick/long beard. You can't expect a black man to have messy long straight hair right?
Ideally, the image of a well groomed man is a man with SHORT HAIR and CLEAN SHAVEN. I know some Africans are proud of their afro hair because it's unique. But just because someone ask you to wear a wig over your afro hair or to cut it short, it doesn't have to be a racist thing.
People always tell me to straighten my hair because having a straight hair doesn't make you look messy as to having curly hair. Well screw them. I'm not gonna waste my money straightening my hair because i love my natural curly hair but yeah i do admit those with straight hair don't look messy. Then again, curly hair is sexy :-D.
Let's face it, society already set the standard of what is "well groomed" or "hot". And for a man, having long hair doesn't mean he's well groomed.Only minority of men can pull off long hair and still look hot. But long hair is never "office-material". The term metrosexual man doesn't apply to mean with long hair.
Basically, black men can't have long hair. They can only have a big hair if they never cut it.
So i would think Nivea has a good defence in making the ad instead of just issuing apology and saying they are wrong. Re-civilized means looking "non messy". And if a black man would look messy, he would have a messy afro and beard. And if a white man were to look messy, he would have long messy hair and beard. I can't really see clearly what products Nivea is promoting in the ad but as far as i know, when you say Nivea, i would think deodorant and facial cleanser. In other words, re-civilised means with Nivea products, you groom yourself to look more presentable.
A piece of advise to the US, maybe they should quit using black models since every time a black model is being used, there will be a racism issue. Like a black model being made fairer. Duh, it's photoshop. Im sure white models are being made to look whiter. Or slim people being made to look slimmer. Photoshop means going overboard with everything with the objective to make things look fake and perfect.
Sometimes the minority can be wayyyyyyy to sensitive and want to make an issue out of everything. If minorities are involved, they will start using the "racist attack". I'm not just talking about the blacks in the US but also the minority in Malaysia. I remembered once there was an issue with a local aid where a character representing the Indian community is being coloured "too dark". Or the chinese character being drawn with "small eyes" a.k.a "mata sepet".
Why is this racism? Aren't majority of Indians dark brown and majority of chinese have small eyes? Why do you have this idea that being dark brown or having small eyes is insulting? Honestly, i never think that being dark brown and having small eyes is a bad thing until the people themselves express their dissatisfaction of having dark skin or small eyes. Dark people want to bleach their skin to make themselves look fairer while those with small eyes want to wear heavy eye makeup or go for operation to make their eyes bigger.
Who's hating who now? Others hate you? Or you hate yourself for having a particular trait that only your race have?
My first impression when i read the article and look at the ad, it does look and sound racist. "Re-civilize" yourself. From the ad it would look like having afro hair and thick beard isn't idealistic.
But after a few mins of thinking, you can look at this whole pic from another point of view. Had the model been a WHITE MALE about to those A WHITE MAN'S HEAD with long messy hair and thick beard, would it look racist? Probably it will look ANTI HIPPIES.
Logically speaking, if a white man were to look messy, he would have long messy hair with thick/long beard. Now if a black man were to look messy, obviously he would have a messy afro hair with thick/long beard. You can't expect a black man to have messy long straight hair right?
Ideally, the image of a well groomed man is a man with SHORT HAIR and CLEAN SHAVEN. I know some Africans are proud of their afro hair because it's unique. But just because someone ask you to wear a wig over your afro hair or to cut it short, it doesn't have to be a racist thing.
People always tell me to straighten my hair because having a straight hair doesn't make you look messy as to having curly hair. Well screw them. I'm not gonna waste my money straightening my hair because i love my natural curly hair but yeah i do admit those with straight hair don't look messy. Then again, curly hair is sexy :-D.
Let's face it, society already set the standard of what is "well groomed" or "hot". And for a man, having long hair doesn't mean he's well groomed.Only minority of men can pull off long hair and still look hot. But long hair is never "office-material". The term metrosexual man doesn't apply to mean with long hair.
Basically, black men can't have long hair. They can only have a big hair if they never cut it.
So i would think Nivea has a good defence in making the ad instead of just issuing apology and saying they are wrong. Re-civilized means looking "non messy". And if a black man would look messy, he would have a messy afro and beard. And if a white man were to look messy, he would have long messy hair and beard. I can't really see clearly what products Nivea is promoting in the ad but as far as i know, when you say Nivea, i would think deodorant and facial cleanser. In other words, re-civilised means with Nivea products, you groom yourself to look more presentable.
A piece of advise to the US, maybe they should quit using black models since every time a black model is being used, there will be a racism issue. Like a black model being made fairer. Duh, it's photoshop. Im sure white models are being made to look whiter. Or slim people being made to look slimmer. Photoshop means going overboard with everything with the objective to make things look fake and perfect.
Sometimes the minority can be wayyyyyyy to sensitive and want to make an issue out of everything. If minorities are involved, they will start using the "racist attack". I'm not just talking about the blacks in the US but also the minority in Malaysia. I remembered once there was an issue with a local aid where a character representing the Indian community is being coloured "too dark". Or the chinese character being drawn with "small eyes" a.k.a "mata sepet".
Why is this racism? Aren't majority of Indians dark brown and majority of chinese have small eyes? Why do you have this idea that being dark brown or having small eyes is insulting? Honestly, i never think that being dark brown and having small eyes is a bad thing until the people themselves express their dissatisfaction of having dark skin or small eyes. Dark people want to bleach their skin to make themselves look fairer while those with small eyes want to wear heavy eye makeup or go for operation to make their eyes bigger.
Who's hating who now? Others hate you? Or you hate yourself for having a particular trait that only your race have?
Friday, August 19, 2011
Issues of The Week (15-18.8.2011)
To sum my whole "exciting" life for this week :
1. COOKIES
Raya cookies are getting more and more freaking expansive. I recently bought this raya cookies for RM 35 for 50 pieces and addicted to it like CRAZY... I've been eating it NON STOP... It's called Snow something.. but it's not your typical raya biscuits.
2. PEOPLE WHO DON'T KNOW HOW TO RESPECT OTHER PEOPLE'S RELIGION
Open this link : http://my.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/man-complains-muslim-prayers-mcdonald-outlet-092253428.html
People with SHALLOW KNOWLEDGE about ISLAM like to make statements saying the Azan is LOUD, ANNOYING, IRRITATING ETC. do you actually know what's the purpose of Azan? It's to remind the Muslims that it's time for their prayers. Is that something bad? Annoying and noisy? hello, we face a lot of noisy things in out life but yet we can tolerate it? Disco music playing for hours you can tolerate? But Azan which is being played for less than 5 mins is irritating?
Which part of Azan is irritating? Are you irritated by its nobleness? Or do get simply irritated with everything that relates to a Muslim and Islam because you simply hate the religion? Face it. You live in Malaysia.
3. MEN
No comment except that they are irritating, inconsiderate, selfish and sweet talkers. God only knows why i'm not even close to becoming a BISEXUAL.
4. A PARTNER AS AN INVESTMENT
Being in a relationship means you have to GIVE AND TAKE. You can't just givveeeee or just receeeeeiiiive... It will be unfair and selfish. So why be in a relationship? Because you know your partner can give you something back in return a.k.a a relationship is an investment. if you can't get anything out of the relationship, what's the point of being in one? Unless you looooove having and keeping BAD INVESTMENTS to show off your STUPIDITY.
So when i hear stories of how partners seem to "suffer" in a marriage, i don't really feel sorry for them especially if they are part of the cause of the problem.
So men spend a lot of money the moment they decide to get married right? The common problem faced by married men is that they are being DEPRIVED OF SEX. So let's see, the husband pays 70% or 80% of the bills but being deprived of sex from the wife. Perhaps the husband feels gratitude because the wife bore him children. Then again, if in the end he has to pay the MAID to clean, cook and look after the children and yet the wife can't entertain him, what is he getting? The wife is of course getting what she wants. Married and having the bills paid.
5. WORK
Argh..... dear boss, i can't do last minute work!
Saturday, August 13, 2011
Impressing the Female Mate...
“Some birds seek to attract a mate by showing off their architectural skills. Constructing nests before the female arrives is a way for males to claim territory and show the suitable nesting areas they can defend. They may also decorate the nest with pebbles, moss, flowers or even litter to make it more eye-catching.”
Why are some MEN SINGLE? One of the possible reasons is because they DON'T KNOW HOW TO COURT THE OPPOSITE SEX.
I've seen cats and dogs mate before. There's no art of courtship with them. They just WANT TO HUMP THE FEMALE and if they can't get the female, they will hump the male (not much difference with the human male anyway).
But with some other animals, there is "The Art of Courtship", like the example i have given above. Some show off how beautiful their feathers are, some dance to impress while there are those who serenade to the female counterparts. In the end, the purposes for all these is to ATTRACT THE FEMALE and for the female to choose them to as a mate.
With HUMAN MALE, i expect them to show some kind of art of courtship too since they are SUPPOSE TO BE INTELLIGENT BEINGS (or am i wrong?).
So what can a human male possibly do to attract the opposite sex?
1. being good looking with hot body OR
2. Rich.. show off how big their car or house is.
so if a man have none of the above, there is only ONE SOLUTION..
Be a gentleman, charming, romantic, caring, bring her out and be able to converse well in all topics (unless you female mate is a pretty dumb bimbo then u won't need to be intelligent). Basically, you must do the "old fashion dating game" because if you don't have a hot physique or money, don't expect a woman to come to you (SO WHO SAYS WOMEN HAVE TO LOOK PRETTY AND SLIM TO GET MEN? EVEN MEN MUST MAINTAIN THEIR LOOKS).
Knowing men, because they are profoundly lazy and couldn't be bothered to make any effort, they like to skip the "dating game" and jump into sex.
Talking about sex 24/7 is not impressive to a girl, asshole.
HONEY, LOOK HOW RED AND SEXY MY NECK IS!!
IF YOU LIKE TO SKIP DATING GAME AND JUMP RIGHT INTO SEX, YOUR SEX LIFE IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE AS BORING AS THIS LION COUPLE. LOOK AT THE LIONESS. INTERESTED? I DON'T THINK SO.
Why are some MEN SINGLE? One of the possible reasons is because they DON'T KNOW HOW TO COURT THE OPPOSITE SEX.
I've seen cats and dogs mate before. There's no art of courtship with them. They just WANT TO HUMP THE FEMALE and if they can't get the female, they will hump the male (not much difference with the human male anyway).
But with some other animals, there is "The Art of Courtship", like the example i have given above. Some show off how beautiful their feathers are, some dance to impress while there are those who serenade to the female counterparts. In the end, the purposes for all these is to ATTRACT THE FEMALE and for the female to choose them to as a mate.
With HUMAN MALE, i expect them to show some kind of art of courtship too since they are SUPPOSE TO BE INTELLIGENT BEINGS (or am i wrong?).
So what can a human male possibly do to attract the opposite sex?
1. being good looking with hot body OR
2. Rich.. show off how big their car or house is.
so if a man have none of the above, there is only ONE SOLUTION..
Be a gentleman, charming, romantic, caring, bring her out and be able to converse well in all topics (unless you female mate is a pretty dumb bimbo then u won't need to be intelligent). Basically, you must do the "old fashion dating game" because if you don't have a hot physique or money, don't expect a woman to come to you (SO WHO SAYS WOMEN HAVE TO LOOK PRETTY AND SLIM TO GET MEN? EVEN MEN MUST MAINTAIN THEIR LOOKS).
Knowing men, because they are profoundly lazy and couldn't be bothered to make any effort, they like to skip the "dating game" and jump into sex.
Talking about sex 24/7 is not impressive to a girl, asshole.
HONEY, LOOK HOW RED AND SEXY MY NECK IS!!
IF YOU LIKE TO SKIP DATING GAME AND JUMP RIGHT INTO SEX, YOUR SEX LIFE IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE AS BORING AS THIS LION COUPLE. LOOK AT THE LIONESS. INTERESTED? I DON'T THINK SO.
The art of Conversion
I'm talking about converting from one religion to another.
I believe the most genuine of conversion is when you convert because you receive "light"/"hidayah" from God or when you use your logic and reason to convert, in the sense that you analyse the teachings of the religion and it made you think you should dedicate yourself to that religion.
The EASIEST method to convert someone is when you prey on those who are WEAK. People's faith are easily shaken when they are at the most vulnerable situation. What do i mean by VULNERABLE SITUATION?
1. In desperate need of money.
2. Undergoing depression.
3. Have no beliefs.
Basically it's when you are FACING PROBLEMS IN LIFE.
I had a friend who converted to another religion. She and some of her siblings converted so this got me interested and i asked the reason of the conversion. And i notice a pattern.
She converted at a time when she was vulnerable. She was undergoing depression and somehow at that time, a friend of hers introduce this abc religion (i shall not name the religion). So she was being preached. It seems like this religion shows a lot of kindness (not that i'm disputing that) and gives her motivating support to continue life despite the depression. And i asked her, what's wrong with your previous religion. She simply told me her God was never there for her at the time when she needed Him the most unlike this religion which she just converted into.
What i believe is that in her previous religion, she has no friends to get her to get over the depression. But in abc religion, the followers are "more people loving". So it's nothing to do with God but to do with the followers. In abc religion, the followers listen to her problems, guide her, give her motivational support etc..
You see, praying to God alone is not enough for you to get over your depression. You need "human support" to comfort and guide you. And it's this human support that helped to relief your pain. Don't we humans like to talk about our problems and have another human listen to us and give solutions and tell us everything will be ok?
So when you have God + human support, we think it's the working of God that your depression is gone. But humans being humans, you simply need the support of another human being.
Sure you want to help the poor, but if you don't have the intention to convert them, then you shouldn't preach about your religion to them WHILE HELPING THEM.
The truth is, when most people provide help, they expect something in return.
I believe the most genuine of conversion is when you convert because you receive "light"/"hidayah" from God or when you use your logic and reason to convert, in the sense that you analyse the teachings of the religion and it made you think you should dedicate yourself to that religion.
The EASIEST method to convert someone is when you prey on those who are WEAK. People's faith are easily shaken when they are at the most vulnerable situation. What do i mean by VULNERABLE SITUATION?
1. In desperate need of money.
2. Undergoing depression.
3. Have no beliefs.
Basically it's when you are FACING PROBLEMS IN LIFE.
I had a friend who converted to another religion. She and some of her siblings converted so this got me interested and i asked the reason of the conversion. And i notice a pattern.
She converted at a time when she was vulnerable. She was undergoing depression and somehow at that time, a friend of hers introduce this abc religion (i shall not name the religion). So she was being preached. It seems like this religion shows a lot of kindness (not that i'm disputing that) and gives her motivating support to continue life despite the depression. And i asked her, what's wrong with your previous religion. She simply told me her God was never there for her at the time when she needed Him the most unlike this religion which she just converted into.
What i believe is that in her previous religion, she has no friends to get her to get over the depression. But in abc religion, the followers are "more people loving". So it's nothing to do with God but to do with the followers. In abc religion, the followers listen to her problems, guide her, give her motivational support etc..
You see, praying to God alone is not enough for you to get over your depression. You need "human support" to comfort and guide you. And it's this human support that helped to relief your pain. Don't we humans like to talk about our problems and have another human listen to us and give solutions and tell us everything will be ok?
So when you have God + human support, we think it's the working of God that your depression is gone. But humans being humans, you simply need the support of another human being.
Sure you want to help the poor, but if you don't have the intention to convert them, then you shouldn't preach about your religion to them WHILE HELPING THEM.
The truth is, when most people provide help, they expect something in return.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)